Building a Better Slice of Toast For Tomorrow ...morning

6.27.2005

Metaphysical Calculus

Can there be a Delta Change? Change here meaning the the grander definition of the word, not of metal currency. Ok well may be not delta, which most of the time refers to the TIME-rate-of-change of the variable that follows it (Ex: Delta Chi is the change of cack over time). d-change would be a more accurate representation of this meandering, the differential change of change. I guess I can't remember if it is mathematically possible to have a differential value without a dependant variable. Change is entirely relative in that there has to be a beginning state and an after state. The dependant variable I guess could be anything: time, position, temperature, goat. Yes, d-change/d-goat...step aside Descartes.

But what if we used the standard meaning of Delta (as in change over time). So if it was Delta Change, then it would represent the rate of change OF changeover time. The equation would be:

change'(t) = (d-change/dt) change(t)

People often say "Life is always in a constant state of change." I'd argue that this assessment is only slightly wrong. Mathematically, if change was constant, then a time rate derivative of change would be zero, meaning that change is not changing over time. But if you take this historically, the rate of change of change seems almost geometric. The Dark Ages lasted x amount of years, The Renaissance lasted half that time, Colonialsm half of that, Industrialism, Information age and so on, each having greater amounts of change in each. Just think about all the forms of communication that have stemmed out in the past 10 years: first email and newsgroups, then web based discussion forums, then instant messenger, Blackberrys, blogs, wikis, etc. Gadgets are the same way. PDAs hit the scene in the late 90's and now they're seeing them headed to obsolesence in the next 3-4 years. This whole concept ofchange of change is almost like Moore's Law for human existence.

So what have we learned from this?
- Jamie really needs a hobby
- change(t)=2t
- The expression should be "Life s always in a constant RATE of change"
- Humans are going to have interesting lives when change is 16 times faster than it is now.
- Jamie has just wasted at least 3 minutes of your time that you could have spent travelling to your local cinema to watch Batman Begins again (or for the first time for you people terrified of your own dorky alter-ego)

10 Comments:

Blogger Waan said...

Another way of saying it might be "change is constant".

There's an important distinction between "change is constant" and "change is A constant". You're dealing semantics, not calculus.

28/6/05 1:42 AM

 
Blogger Mr. Nutty said...

My cat's breath smells like cat food.

28/6/05 9:06 AM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

ITEMS MISSING FROM THIS POST

A) Boobies (or rather, breasticles)
B) Zebra Cakes

Who are you, you tall, masked man?

1/7/05 12:45 PM

 
Blogger pasq242 said...

Well, on the computing side, it'll be well and good until we start hitting physical constraints of matter. I found this article, which is pretty interesting; it discusses the universal limits of technology. You will probably eat this shit up.

5/7/05 5:33 PM

 
Blogger Unknown said...

are you died?

24/8/05 3:37 PM

 
Blogger Waan said...

We should start a new blog in Jamie's comment section since Capt. Poo-Guy doesn't post any more.

8/9/05 5:53 PM

 
Blogger scalpystraz said...

I agree. I mean, it's not like Jamie doesn't have "stuff" going on that's "interesting" to read about. JAMIE! STOP BEING SO LAME! OR AT LEAST PUT UP A VIDEO CAMERA SO WE CAN STALK YOU FROM OUR HOMES AND/OR OFFICES!!!

9/9/05 9:52 PM

 
Blogger $teve-0 said...

I think that Jamie says more with silence than he ever does with words ... mostly because his words aren't really words, consisting largely of robotic pops and whistles.

13/9/05 9:08 AM

 
Blogger Waan said...

It reminds me of a cross between a modem dialing and a fart piped through a voice modulator. Jamie, I accept and love you despite your Frankenstein-ish quirks and tear-gas quality halitosis.

13/9/05 9:27 PM

 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

June 24, 2014 - The end of the world as we know it. So, if change is geometric, and the last cycle doubled our rate of change in 4 years, then theoretically, in 7.9 years we will achieve an infinite rate of change. I'm guessing it's at that point that society achieves pure enlightenment and everyone transformes into omnipotent forms of blueish light. Well, everyone that matters at least.

9/10/06 12:51 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home